Disclaimer: This essay is provided as an example of work produced by students studying towards a marketing degree, it is not illustrative of the work produced by our in-house experts. Click here for sample essays written by our professional writers.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UKEssays.com.

Marketing and Management Sustainability Analysis: Ford Case Study

Paper Type: Free Essay Subject: Marketing
Wordcount: 2873 words Published: 8th Feb 2020

Reference this

Background to The Company

The second-largest U.S.-based automobile producer Ford Motor Company is headquartered in Dearborn, Michigan, Detroit. Henry Ford was the founder of the company who incorporated it on June 16, 1903. Ford is a seller of cars and commercial vehicles with major brands Ford and Lincoln. Lincoln includes mostly luxury cars. The company is managed and controlled the Ford family, which has least ownership but maximum voting power. Although the company became public in 1956, the Ford family reserved 40 percent voting rights with the help of special Class B shares.  Ford is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Additionally, being the second principal automobile company in the US after General Motors, Ford is the fifth-largest automobile manufacturer in the world according to the 2015 estimate of vehicle production. In 2018, the company earned revenue of US$160.3 billion with a net profit earning of US$ 3.6 billion. In Australia alone the company sold 1 million units of automobile each in 2017 and 2018 and held a market share of 6.6 percent and 6 percent respectively (Annual Report 2018). 

The key strategies of the companies are competitive pricing, controlling production according to seasonality of demand, not allowing backlogs to accumulate during any period, maintaining wide supplier base to meet the raw material needs, a keen eye on cost management, ensuring sound execution of Corporate Governance Principles together with Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Personnel, Code of Ethics for the Board of Directors, and Code of Corporate Conduct for all employees.

Key Principles of Sustainable Marketing and Management Practices (500)

Like any other business operations marketing also has its share of impact on behaviours involving its objective of channelizing goods and services to their target customers that should be changed. Marketing is perceived as the source of many problems that directly relate to the sustainability issue.

Get Help With Your Essay

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!
Find out more about our Essay Writing Service

A key concept is sustainable marketing with an underlying philosophy of promoting credibility and responsibility to develop better consumption practice, better relationships and making businesses more reasonable. Sustainable marketing also encourages efficiency, motivates creativity, endorses and preserves cooperation. On an operational level, sustainable marketing aspires to impact customer behaviour to produce positive social change through which the companies can generate a new long-term profit. It also means creation of brands that incorporate commercial and social future of the company.

 Marketing has undergone a three-step evolution within the framework of sustainable development. The first phase dates to the 1970s. It includes ecological marketing, which focuses on ecological problems, like pollution of air and water, exhaustion of natural resources, and derogatory impact of fertilizers and pesticides on agriculture and environment. The second stage is the 1980s when the concept like environmental marketing came into vogue. The idea centred around developing modern, technologies that are environment friendly and “clean”.  The third stage represents the present era of sustainable marketing, envisioning a responsible economic and social development. The focus of sustainable marketing is to meet the needs of today’s consumer at the same time making room for consumers of next generations and the opportunity of fulfilling their needs.

A related theoretical concept that has developed to deal with environmental issues in marketing activities is known as Green Marketing. Broadly speaking, green marketing is “a pre- and post-production philosophy that aims to fulfil the demands and needs of customers and sustain in long term the company’s future in a social and environmentally responsible manner” (Szuster 2008).

Green marketing is more than just about promoting or selling a company’s product by exploiting the environmental concern of the consumers. Rather, it is dealing with the issues that have a direct or indirect effect on quality of life of people, and which could even be threatening to life. Green marketing is a balanced approach to different aspect of business namely social, economic, technological, and physical and to societies which allow organizations to operate and progress.  It mainly emphasizes on sustainability which is a long-term concept involving qualitative development instead of growth which is short-term and quantitative and can be unsustainable. The concept considers consumers as real humans with emotions and feeling in place of imaginary ‘rational economic’ entities (Groening, Sarkis & Zhu 2018).  Green marketing promotes fulfillment of genuine customer needs rather than merely stimulating some superficial desires. The theory acknowledges that the society and the consumers many times have conflicting multiple needs and accepts that the current nature of the economy, which is based on large scale and long-distance operations, is not sustainable (Polonsky 2015). In the future, the economy will revert to small and local ventures. The theory also believes that embracing eco-friendly performances a company can improve its products as well as have a good impact on the environment.

Explanation of The Theory – The Concept of Sustainability (500)

Ford has taken many steps from its understanding that mobility energies human progress. From this very understanding, the he company feels responsible to deliver positive changes to the society.

In 2010, Ford targeted that it will lower its global CO2 emissions per vehicle it produce sat leastby30% within the year 2025. The company achieved the milestone eight years early.  The Ford Sustainability Report for 2017-2018 draws attention to their continuing efforts to follow business practices that are responsible and efficient.

Mobility solutions
With an eye to women empowerment through increasing their access to mobility, Ford introduced a unique program in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in 2018.The ground-breaking program was collaboration with Effat University of Jeddah. It was named “Driving Skills for Life ‘For Her’”- a never seen before initiative to impart driving lessons for women in the wake of the royal verdict that lifted the prohibition on women driving cars and getting a driving license in the Kingdom.  The program taught vital skills required for new drivers and provided other necessary driving tips from experts and developed a deep understanding of safety in the process of driving to more than 250 students who were amid the first to graduate from the program.

Electrification
Ford has pioneered a pan-European joint venture named IONITY in collaboration with Daimler AG, BMW Group, Volkswagen Group along with Porsche and Audi. The objective of the undertaking is to develop a network of fast-charging stations for electric vehicles. IONITY aims at building 400 stations for fast charging in prime locations in Europe by the year 2020. These stations will have a charging capacity of 350 kW. The work for construction of 20 stations spread across multiple European countries started in 2017, and within a year the first charging station became operational in Germany. These stations are considered to be major contributors to address the issue of climate change.

Products and operations
The company has taken another innovative step to reduce its manufacturing greenhouse gas emissions by producing around 300 parts from renewable ingredients It used eight materials that are sustainable in nature in production of vehicles, namely rice, wheat, soy, castor, tree cellulose, kenaf or hibiscus, coconut, and jute. With less consumption of energy, less generation of waste and less dependence on fossil fuels, Ford managed to achieve a 228 million pound curtailment in CO2 right from 2011 when it first switched to soybean-based foam.

Transparency in the supply chain

As a customer of almost 1,200 Tier 1 production dealers who are supplying around 40,000 parts per vehicle, the company understands the importance of accountable sourcing of raw materials in their complex material supply chain. The company has acknowledged this as one of the most vital issues in their recent human rights assessment.

In 2017, Ford partnered with other top automotive companies to initiate Drive Sustainability. Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) extended the Automotive Industry Guiding Principles to Enhance Sustainability Performance in the Supply Chain. The organizations also introduced Practical Guidance that includes expectations from supplier in relation to responsible sourcing of materials. The document is also issued to intensify awareness and reliability in the supply chain of automotive industry.

Analysis of The Situation

The sustainability marketing has earned Ford a very good reputation is the automobile industry as a responsible organization. The following are the results that Ford has achieved during last few years through its sustainability marketing endeavours.

Financial Health

2015

2016

2017

Adjusted pre-tax profit, $ billion

10.8

10.4

8.4

Customer and Products

Ford U.S. corporate average fuel economy, combined car and truck fleet, miles per gallon (higher mpg reflects improvement)

30.0

29.8

29.6

Ford U.S. CO2 tailpipe emissions per vehicle, combined car and truck fleet, grams per mile (lower grams per mile reflects improvement)

296

308

306

Ford Europe CO2 tailpipe emissions per passenger vehicle, grams per kilometre (100% of vehicles)

118.133

119.964

120.86

Operations

Worldwide facility energy consumption per vehicle, kilowatt hours per vehicle

2244

2133

2092

Worldwide facility CO2 emissions per vehicle, metric tons

0.72

0.69

0.67

Supply Chain

Total supplier sites trained/retrained in sustainability management (cumulative, since 2005)

3156

3302

3549

Source: Ford Sustainability Report 1017-18.

Conclusion

As a major automobile company Ford has impressed the world with its proactive sustainable marketing. However, it is yet to reap financial benefits from its efforts as can be seen form the dwindling profits level in the year 2017. There are other economic factors which are strong enough to supersede its sustainability endeavours and come in between the company and seem to prevent the company from reaping the financial benefits of sustainable marketing. Keeping that part aside, from rest of the data it is apparent the company has achieved a milestone so far as sustainability is concerned. It has proved its dedication and commitment towards sustainability concerns unquestionably. It can be hoped that in the near future the company will be rewarded for its honest and sincere efforts.

Reference List

Journals

  • Groening, C, Sarkis, J, & Zhu, Q 2018. “Green marketing consumer-level theory review: A compendium of applied theories and further research directions”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 172, pp. 1848-1866. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.002 [Accessed on 26 March 2019]
  • José-Carlos García-Rosell&Johanna Moisander (2008). Ethical Dimensions of Sustainable Marketing: A Consumer Policy Perspective. European Advances in Consumer Research, vol.8, pp. 210-215. Available from https://www.academia.edu/316146/Ethical_Dimensions_of_Sustainable_Marketing_A_Consumer_Policy_Perspective
  • López, V. M., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007).Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal ofBusiness Ethics, vol. 75, no.3, pp.285 – 300.
  • Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customersatisfaction and market value. Journal of Marketing, vol. 70, pp.1 – 18.
  • Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007).Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies.  Academy ofManagement Review, vol.32, no.3, pp.817 – 835.
  • Panday, R, Kumari, S, Shrivastava, P & Rai, UK (2017). Sustainable marketing practices: A potential strategy for sustainable development in emerging economies. International Conference on Marketing Paradigms in Emerging Economies. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257417207_Sustainable_Marketing_Practices_A_Potential_Strategy_for_Sustainable_Development_in_Emerging_Economies
  • Pape Jessica, Rau Henrike, Fahy Frances, Davies Anna (2011). Developing policies and instruments for sustainable household consumption: Irish experiences and futures. Journal of Consumer Policy, vol. 34, no 34, pp. 25-42.
  • Polonsky M J 2015. “Green marketing strategy: A stakeholder theory approach”. In: Grant K., Walker I. (eds) Proceedings of the 1995 World Marketing Congress. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham
  • Ren Liqin, XieGuangya, Krabbendam,Koos (2010). Sustainable competitive advantage andmarketing innovation within firms. A pragmatic approach for Chinese firms. Management Research Review,vol. 33,no. 1, pp. 79-89.
  • Schlegelmilch B. Bodo, Oberseder Magdalena (2010). Half a century of marketing ethics:Shifting perspectives and emerging trends.  Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 93, pp.1-19.
  • Torres, MJM, et al. (2018). An Assessment Tool to Integrate Sustainability Principles into the Global Supply Chain. Sustainability, vol.10, no 2.
  • Tseng, M-L, Lim, MK, Wong, W-P, Chen, Y-C, & Zhan, Y (2018).  A framework for evaluating the performance of sustainable service supply chain management under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, vol 195, pp. 359-372.

Websites

 

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on UKEssays.com then please:

Related Services

Our academic writing and marking services can help you!

Prices from

£124

Approximate costs for:

  • Undergraduate 2:2
  • 1000 words
  • 7 day delivery

Order an Essay

Related Lectures

Study for free with our range of university lecture notes!

Academic Knowledge Logo

Freelance Writing Jobs

Looking for a flexible role?
Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher?

Apply Today!